Murdoch Mysteries Attempts To Unravel The Greatest Mystery Of Them All.

Never mind big spiders or erectile dysfunction, as a 47-year-old male my biggest fear is facing life’s greatest question: “When do I feel like I’m too damn old to contribute anything more to society?”

You can exercise, eat right and take fistfuls of vitamins, but in the end, your mortality will always be waiting in the back of your mind to confront you like a school bully or in some cases, the grim specter of death.

Upbeat review so far, isn’t it?

Please forgive me, friends, but mortality was front and center in writer Dan Trotta’s mind when crafting this week’s Murdoch Mysteries episode, Dr. Osler Regrets. Indeed, the ep covered a lot of ground; the turn-of-the-century version of internet shaming, professional ethics in the press, and even the stress of infertility joined mortality as the big questions MM tackled this week. So let’s get to it, shall we?

ONE)  Fact and fiction merged, courtesy of Dr. Osler.  As the ep opened we met historical figure, Dr. William Osler, who joined the Murdochs to reminisce with his old student Julia. Linking Dr. Ogden to Dr. Osler was a brilliant move, one which allowed Peter Mitchel and his team to explore another big issue later on. Osler provided sage advice to both Julia and the Inspector, helping both of them to navigate important character arcs in a single adventure. There was real-life controversy and even rumors of actual suicides surrounding Osler and the MM team ran with this, to great effect.

And speaking of the Inspector…


“We’re featuring fake news this week?  Bloody hell, Murdoch, Trump’s going to have our arses!”


TWO)  “Not everything is a mystery, Murdoch, some men are just crackers!”  Thomas Brackenreid may be blunt, gruff and the most unlikely detective of all, but he followed this line up with an exploration of his own mortality and even an eleventh hour revelation that helped blow the case of a sequential killer stalking older men wide open. Once again, I cannot properly express my joy at seeing Thomas Craig return to a more active role on Murdoch Mysteries.


THREE)  Fake news, courtesy of Bea Santos’ Louise Cherry.  I know I’m in the minority when I say this, but I’ve always liked Miss Cherry. Yes, it turns out she has virtually no moral or professional compass, but the woman has spunk and while Lou Grant hates spunk, it has an important role to play on a show like MM that showcases strong female characters on a regular basis. Sure, she may have come pretty close to derailing William’s entire case, and she vexed Crabtree immeasurably, but as usual she landed on her feet and dragged Toronto’s entire journalism community down into the mire with her. Wait a minute, I was supposed to be defending her, wasn’t I?

Oh well, speaking of strong female characters…


“I don’t suppose there’s much point in asking for a conjugal visit from Constable Crabtree, is there, detective?”


FOUR)  Violet Hart is full of turn-of-the-century sass!  You just know someone tweeted, “Oh no, she didn’t!” when Dr. Ogden’s newest assistant started riffing zingers in the morgue. Her cutting humor (get it?) will help separate Miss Hart from her departed predecessor, Miss James. I know this particular casting change has many fans scratching their heads, but I think we can expect great things from Violet Hart.


FIVE)  Everyone had a role to play this week.  Higgins. The younger Brackenreid. The aforementioned Miss Hart. MM’s supporting players were all given a chance to contribute this week, which is always nice, not to mention very Canadian.


SIX)  Julia wants to give William more than just bedroom games involving blindfolds…  Yes, it has been established that Dr. Ogden’s infertility is the result of a botched abortion, but this week we saw a glimmer of hope in the form of an actual historical medical breakthrough. Here’s hoping Julia heeds her former mentor’s advice and proceeds cautiously. I’d hate to lose Hélène Joy’s Julia Murdoch to a another risky medical procedure, though that would make for intriguing – and heartbreaking – television.

On the other hand, just think of the cool baby equipment William could invent if the Murdochs had their own bundle of joy.



SEVEN)  Where the bloody hell was Watts?  Catching a sequential killer would’ve been right up his alley, but hopefully we’ll see Daniel Maslany back soon.


EIGHT)  Did you catch the Frankie Drake Mysteries promo at the bottom of your screen?  Yes, Monday, November 6 brings us the premier of Frankie Drake Mysteries, but the series actually begins with a web series featuring older versions of Brackenreid and Watts which you can watch now. The timing couldn’t be better considering the Inspector declared he had plenty of fight left in him in this episode. (Frankie Drake takes place decades after MM, in case you weren’t aware.)

Personally, I can’t wait to see what MM alum Michelle Ricci and Carol Hay have cooked up for us.


Looks like glasses are going to be popular among males in 1920s Toronto…



And on that note, I bid you farewell until we meet again in two weeks for the next exciting episode of Murdoch Mysteries.

See you in the lobby and on the CBC, kids…


About The Hook

Husband. Father. Bellman. Author of The Bellman Chronicles. Reader of comic books and observer and chronicler of the human condition. And to my wife's eternal dismay, a mere mortal and non-vampire. I'm often told I look like your uncle, cousin, etc. If I wore a hat, I'd hang it on a hat rack in my home in Niagara Falls, Canada. You can call me The Hook, everyone else does.
This entry was posted in Hotel Life and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Murdoch Mysteries Attempts To Unravel The Greatest Mystery Of Them All.

  1. nbratscott says:

    Thanks for these reviews! I don’t get to see each episode for a day or so, so it is nice to get your take without giving everything away. I could not keep myself from reading if you included the spoilers.

  2. dianaepona says:

    LOL, so…you think being 47 brings on thoughts of mortality? Try being 66. It helps to have a doctor like mine. When I told him my latest issue with my back was probably due to my age, he looked me in the eye and said, “you’ll never hear me say that until you hit 90. Then I will say, ‘well, what did you expect?” At which point I told him if we were still talking when I was 90, he could say whatever he pleased.

    Great review, Hook! My advice to the Murdochs would be to adopt. Too many ragamuffins running around, or stuck in those horrible orphanages back then. Think of the marvelous home they could offer to one. Oh, well. Duty calls. I have to go slap some people. All in a day’s work for this crone.

    Blessings, dude!

  3. It’s a delightful review, Hook. I look forward to seeing this episode one day! Hugs.

  4. Karen Brentnell says:

    Once again, Hook, you have done it, hit the mark! Love your point of view and humour!! Love it and thank you!

  5. StillWaters says:

    I like Louise Cherry better as a sleazy journalist rather than as the pushy, presumptuous Girlfriend-du-Jour for Crabtree.
    It will be interesting to see how the Julia fertility story plays out. I’m still waiting for William’s son by Anna Fulford to show up. (Thought I’d drop that one in.)

  6. You make me wish I watched MM on a more regular basis. It is a terrific show and I always enjoy it when I get a chance to watch it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s